Updated: 1 hour ago
The Montgomery News | October 3, 2025
Six candidates are running for three open seats on the Montgomery School Board, following a year of long, heated discussions at board meetings, some lasting until midnight. The current board of nine members could be described as fractured on multiple important issues.
The local chapter of the League of Women Voters and The Montgomery News invited all school board candidates to a participate a candidates' forum during the month of October - as has been a common local practice. Three candidates said yes (Julius Nunez, Francine Pfeffer, and Katheryn Worland of the Excellence in Education Slate). Two did not respond (Jiying “Peter” Li and Joanna Filak), and Ania Wolecka-Jernigan responded no. Incumbent Michelle Dowling will not seek another term.
The candidates' answers in this "In Their Own Words" series are unedited. The Montgomery News is donating this space.
Q: Do you believe in an educational “voucher system” that would allow parents to take taxpayer money and divert it to pay for private school tuition costs? Why?
A: While voucher systems and education savings accounts are determined at the state level, our local responsibility is clear: to ensure every student in our district receives a high-quality public education. Families deserve value for their tax dollars, and we must make the most of the resources allocated to the school district—supporting students, teachers, and schools.
At the same time, we acknowledge that some families look for alternatives when their child’s needs are not fully met. A precedent for this flexibility already exists in special education. When a district cannot adequately serve a student with special needs, it provides support for that student to learn in another school setting. Extending this principle to all learners raises important questions of fairness and access. Our priority remains strengthening public schools, while engaging in broader policy discussions with a commitment to equity and opportunity for every student.
Q: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, why or why not: “The responsibility of School Board members in New Jersey is confined to policy making, planning and appraisal, and helping to frame policies and plans after consultation with those affected by them. A board member’s responsibility is not to administer the schools, but to see that they are well run.”
A: We agree that School Board members in New Jersey are responsible for policy making, planning, and oversight—not daily administration. The Board sets direction, approves budgets, and evaluates outcomes to ensure our schools reflect the community’s values and goals. School administrators, including superintendents, directors, and principals, are responsible for managing schools, overseeing daily operations, and implementing curriculum. The Board provides oversight and strategic direction, supporting their work while holding them accountable. This partnership ensures effective governance while respecting professional expertise.
Q: Who do you believe should be determining which books are in the school library system and in the curriculum and why?
A: The selection of books for school libraries and curricula should be led by qualified educators and certified librarians, with Board oversight and opportunities for input from parents and the community. These professionals possess the expertise to evaluate materials for educational merit, developmental appropriateness, and the inclusion of diverse perspectives.
The Board does not choose books—it approves them. This process ensures transparency and alignment with district goals while honoring the expertise of those closest to the classroom. Our shared goal is to foster intellectual growth, character development, and inclusive learning opportunities for all students.
Q: Montgomery’s population includes a large percentage of immigrants. What is the role of schools when interacting with ICE in your community?
A: Montgomery’s diverse population includes many immigrant families, and our schools must remain safe, welcoming environments for every student—regardless of immigration status. Federal law guarantees all children the right to a free public education, and we are committed to upholding that right. Schools should follow legal procedures when interacting with government agencies, while prioritizing student privacy and well-being. Clear communication with families and access to resources help build trust and ensure that all students feel supported. Our mission is to educate. Our schools should foster a climate of trust where every student can thrive academically and socially.
Q: Do you support the implementation of policy 5756? If elected, will you seek to rescind or remove the policy and why or why not? If the policy is removed or rescinded in your district, what is your alternative plan dealing with the issues this policy covers?
A: Policy 5756 provides guidance for supporting transgender and gender-nonconforming students by emphasizing respect for chosen names and pronouns, safeguarding privacy, and ensuring equal access. Federal and state laws—such as the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) and Title IX—prohibit discrimination and protect all students, including on the basis of gender identity and expression. These statutes establish the binding legal framework that schools must follow, whether or not Policy 5756 is in place.
Our district must ensure student safety while fostering strong partnerships with families. That means: Following all federal and state protections so every student feels safe and respected; Encouraging open communication with parents when it can be done safely and appropriately; Reviewing practices to ensure legal compliance and minimize risk. Rather than focusing on a single policy, our priority is to protect students, respect families, and uphold the law. That’s the balanced approach we support.
Q: What issues, if any, do you believe our district needs to address in its academic program and vocational and fine arts offerings? What changes would you recommend?
A: To remain competitive and inclusive, our district should continue to strengthen academic, vocational, and fine arts programs.
Academics: Expand dual-enrollment opportunities to help students earn college credit, introduce additional STEM learning opportunities offered in neighboring districts to strengthen future-ready skills, and align literacy instruction with the Science of Reading to improve outcomes for all students.
Vocational Education: Recognize that not all students pursue four-year degrees. Build partnerships with businesses, trade unions, and colleges to offer apprenticeships, certifications, and internships in fields like healthcare, technology, and skilled trades.
Fine Arts: Protect and expand opportunities in music, theater, and visual arts. Introduce modern disciplines like digital media and graphic design to foster creativity and connect students to emerging careers.
The Excellence in Education Slate includes Julius Nunez, Francine Pfeffer, and Katheryn Worland. This election will have serious consequences on the future of the school district, so it is important to vote.
>> Click the names or photos above to review their responses.■
